Wednesday, November 5, 2014

College Study #92: "Keeping the Silence"



‘Behold, the Lamb of God’

ide o amnos tou theou

College Study

92nd teaching

11.3.2014

 

“Keeping the Silence”

 






          Review:

                    Last week we began to delve into the actual narrative laid down in the Gospel according to Luke. Last time, our study was entitled “Breaking the Silence” since Zacharias’ encounter with the angel in the Temple represents the first time in 400 years that a message from God comes to His people. Luke began his narrative with what event; not the birth of Christ but the announcement of the birth of…? He also began with three characters: two men and one woman. Who were they? Who was Herod the Great? Who was Zacharias? Who was Elizabeth and what was her trial? What does their long trial tell us about how much God values faith? What was Zacharias’ job at the beginning of this story and what does he have to do in the Temple? Is this the same Temple that the minor prophet Haggai encouraged the people to build back in the Old Testament? What about angels: what branch of theology is concerned with the study of angels? What do we know about angels from the Bible? Since we left Zacharias praying at the altar, we closed with some final thoughts on prayer. The discipline of prayer involves at least these three things: Perseverance, Selflessness, and Anticipation. That is, we should persevere in prayer even when all hope from our perspective as humans is gone, and that we should interceded for others and finally pray with excitement and anticipation of incredible things that God may desire to do in our lives and in this group. I was challenged in thinking last week about the revolutionary things that God accomplished through believers in the past, and there is no reason that anyone in here cannot accomplish the same things when surrendered to God.

          End of Review                                                                            

 

          Though last week our title was “Breaking the Silence”, referencing the first words from God that shattered the silence of the 400 years between the Old and New Testaments, tonight we’re going to see that silence in some way perpetuated. Therefore, tonight’s study is entitled: “Keeping the Silence”.

          Turn to Luke 1:5-25.

          There was in the days of Herod, the king of Judea, a certain priest named Zacharias, of the division of Abijah. His wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elizabeth. And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless. But they had no child, because Elizabeth was barren, and they were both well advanced in years. So it was, that while he was serving as priest before God in the order of his division, according to the custom of the priesthood, his lot fell to burn incense when he went into the temple of the Lord. And the whole multitude of the people was praying outside at the hour of incense. Then an angel of the Lord appeared to him, standing on the right side of the altar of incense. And when Zacharias saw him, he was troubled, and fear fell upon him. But the angel said to him, ‘Do not be afraid, Zacharias, for your prayer is heard; and your wife Elizabeth will bear you a son, and you shall call his name John. And you will have joy and gladness, and many will rejoice at his birth. For he will be great in the sight of the Lord, and shall drink neither wine nor strong drink. He will also be filled with the Holy Spirit, even from his mother’s womb. And he will turn many of the children of Israel to the Lord their God. He will also go before Him in the spirit and power of Elijah, ‘to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children,’ and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just, to make ready a people prepared for the Lord.’ And Zacharias said to the angel, ‘How shall I know this? For I am an old man, and my wife is well advanced in years.’ And the angel answered and said to him, ‘I am Gabriel, who stands in the presence of God, and was sent to speak to you and bring you these glad tidings. But behold, you will be mute and not able to speak until the day these things take place because you did not believe my words which will be fulfilled in their own time.’

            “And the people waited for Zacharias, and marveled that he lingered so long in the temple. But when he came out, he could not speak to them; and they perceived that he had seen a vision in the temple, for he beckoned to them and remained speechless. So it was, as soon as the days of his service were completed, that he departed to his own house. Now after those days his wife Elizabeth conceived; and she hid herself five months, saying, ‘Thus the Lord has dealt with me, in the days when He looked on me, to take away my reproach among people’.”

          We left poor old Zack there having the scare of his life at the altar of incense, and we’re picking up the text in v.13 where, notice, the angel tells Zacharias that his prayer had been heard. Last week, we established the probability that Zacharias had already stopped praying for a son many years ago and was most likely in this moment praying not for an heir for his household but for a Savior for his nation.

          By telling him that his prayer had been heard, and announcing to him that he was going to have a son, both the past prayers and the present day prayer of Zacharias would be answered. For he would not only have a son, an heir, but this son would go on to play a pivotal role in the redemptive plan of God.

          His son would be called “John”. Like the Herods of the Bible, there are many men named John in the Bible. John was a popular name, evidently. Maybe not to the degree that it is in our time, when you can meet several Johns on any day, but it was popular nonetheless. And why not? John is a great name.

          John comes through the Latin Johannes through the Greek Ioannes through the Hebrew Yohanan, which comes from the phrase meaning “God is gracious”. So the name “John” has to do with the grace of God, the Lord being gracious toward people. Certainly there could be no better name for the son of Zacharias and Elizabeth. Here the angel is making clear by the choice of the name “John” that this son is a gift of God’s grace, an undeserved gift. True, Zack and Liz were righteous and blameless people, we’re told, but even they were not good enough to match God’s perfect standard of righteousness.

          The prophet reminds us that “all our righteous acts are like filthy rags” (Isaiah 64:4). The son they were about to receive was not earned by Zacharias or Elizabeth because they had done so much for God. No, God is making it clear that this son is given to them because He is a gracious God. They couldn’t even have kids anymore because of their age! Of course this son would be a gift. He’s showing them that He’s not Santa Claus, with some cosmic checklist of naughty and nice people getting good or bad gifts, but that He is our loving heavenly Father who gives good gifts to His children by His grace, despite the fact that His children do not deserve His gifts.

          So the kid is going to be named “John”. This isn’t John the Evangelist, one of the apostles, the guy who wrote John’s Gospel. This is, as we should find out if we kept reading, none other than John the Baptist, who got his title because that’s what he did: he baptized. He was a baptizer. So thus he’s known as John the Baptist. And he will be the one to announce the coming of the Messiah, the Savior, the King of the Jews.

          We see that moment in John 1:29 where John the Baptist sees Jesus and cries out “Behold! The Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world!” And also that is where we get the title of our college group from.

          Now what kind of a man will this John grow up to become? Let’s see what the angel says about him:

          v.14, of course their baby boy would bring them joy and gladness. That’s to be expected. I’ve seen even the hardest of folks who say they don’t like children simply melt whenever a little baby is brought around. And Zack and Liz would have so much joy with this little bundle of life that would be brought to them at last.

          Even, it is to be expected that many would rejoice at his birth. I’m sure that Zacharias and Elizabeth had friends. They seem like good-natured, friendly people. Perhaps there were still a few lone prayer warriors that had continued to pray for them to have children long after the old couple themselves had given up on that.

          But the joy this son would bring goes way beyond just Zack and Liz and their friends and neighbors. Their son had a destiny awaiting him as forerunner of the Messiah.

          v.15, “For he will be great in the sight of the Lord…”

          What made John the Baptist a great man? Was it because of all he accomplished for God? Was it because he baptized many, many people over the course of his career? Was it because he got to utter those words “Behold! The Lamb of God!”?

          How does God equate greatness? What makes someone great in the eyes of God?

          Well, certainly, we know that it is not the same things that make a man or a woman great in the eyes of the world. In our society, we equate greatness with wealth and possessions and accomplishments and prestige. We look at the outward things, whereas the Bible says “the LORD looks at the heart” (1 Samuel 16:7).

          That statement was made in the context of the prophet Samuel choosing the next king. He’s looking at all these big, handsome, strapping young men and thinking “these guys look like king-material” but God’s choice ended up being David, the youngest of his brothers and the little guy they left out to tend to the sheep. Yet the littlest of the brothers ended up being the greatest king Israel ever had.

          To us, a great person is an wealthy CEO or a tycoon landowner or an accomplished writer or filmmaker or a successful actor or athlete. To us, the stature of a man or woman, their physical appearance and fitness, their outward beauty and the money they make each year determines how great they are. In our standards, Herod the Great was a great man, accomplished, powerful, and Zacharias and his son were nobodies.

          Actor Robert Downey Jr. topped Forbes magazine’s annual list of the highest paid actors for the second year in a row, and according to one article I found written in July of 2014, he made an estimated $75 million over the past year. Isn’t that success? Isn’t that “making it”, right to the top? Isn’t that greatness?

          Not in my book. Not if he’s playing lame Iron Man and not Batman, but that’s another story.

          J.C. Ryle wrote in his commentary on Luke: “The measure of greatness which is common among men is utterly false and deceptive.” Greatness is measured in the world by wealth, accomplishments, position and prestige. Not so with God. Not so with John.

          What kind of wealth did John the Baptist have? None whatsoever. He didn’t sup on sumptuous foodstuffs. He didn’t dress to impress. He didn’t roll around Jerusalem in a Rolls Royce. Matthew 3:4 tells us that his particular choice of threads was camel’s hair and a leather belt, and that he dined not on caviar and foie gras, but on locusts and wild honey, by no means the food of the wealthy. What’s more, where do we find John: in Caesar’s palace? In Herod’s court? In the posh lounges of the Pharisees? No, he was out in the wilderness, the wild, the desert, baptizing people in a dirty river.

          What kind of accomplishments did John the Baptist have? None by human standards. He didn’t build any great buildings like Herod. He didn’t have a powerful guard of soldiers at his disposal. He didn’t write any great books or poems or pieces of philosophy. He didn’t even establish any churches. Not one. All he did was preach repentance and baptize.

          What kind of position did John the Baptist have? Hardly any. We call him not John the Prince, John the Duke, John the King or John the Great, we call him John the Baptist.

          What kind of prestige did John the Baptist have? Probably, not much. Certainly not much by our standards. He didn’t own any corporations. He was not the head of any councils or governing authorities. He ruled nothing and had control over nothing but himself.

          So then what made John great in the sight of the Lord? His humility. He owned nothing, he built nothing, he had no power, no authority, no prestige and no position, he had nothing. But I like what Pastor Alistair Begg said about this “Nothingness is everything in the sight of the Lord!”

          And look at the kind of humility that John exemplified. He was active in the wilderness, he dressed in ordinary, even dirty clothing, his job was dirty, he could hardly get any lower. Nobody would look at him and think “greatness”. That would be the ultimate paradox: a great and low man, someone looked up to while you look down at. But when the crowds came to be baptized and his ministry was found successful, it couldn’t be because of lowly John. Everything he did would automatically go to the glory not of himself but of God.

          Flip over to John 1:19 and look at the realism of his humility. “Now this is the testimony of John, when the Jews sent priest and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, ‘Who are you?’

          That was the chance for his pride and his flesh to rise up: “Don’t you know who I am? Don’t you know that the angel Gabriel, yes the Gabriel, announced my birth? Don’t you know that Isaiah prophesied about me? Don’t you know that I play an important role in God’s plan to bring your Messiah into the world?”

          Yet that’s not what he said. Who are you, John?

          He confessed, and did not deny, but confessed, ‘I am not the Christ.’ And they asked him, ‘What then? Are you Elijah?’ He said, ‘I am not.’ ‘Are you the Prophet?’ And he answered, ‘No.’ Then they said to him, ‘Who are you, that we may give an answer to those who sent us? What do you say about yourself?’ He said: ‘I am ‘the voice of one crying in the wilderness; make straight the way of the LORD’, as the prophet Isaiah said’.”

            You’re not Elijah. You’re not the Prophet. Who the heck are you, then? And he replies “I’m just a voice crying in the wilderness”.

          Toward the end of John’s life (remember he was beheaded by Herod) said of Jesus “He must increase, but I must decrease” (John 3:30). People were beginning to leave John’s ministry of baptism for Christ and what does he say? Does he bemoan that the success of his ministry is beginning to fade? Does he complain that his attendance is decreasing? No, he says that Christ must increase and he must decrease, showing his obvious preference not for himself but for the Son of God instead.

          What made John great in the sight of God was John’s humility, his nothingness so that Christ would be his everything. We’re told that God resists the proud but gives grace to the humble (James 4:6). How appropriate since John’s own name references God’s grace! Not only his name, but his very life, exemplified the grace of God upon this great and humble man.

          *One more note on humility before we move on. Beloved British author C.S. Lewis said it best and most succinctly: “True humility is not thinking less of yourself; it is thinking of yourself less.” There’s a fine line there. But humility, realize, is not the same thing as self-abasement, of constantly saying how bad you are at things, how incapable you are, how everything you do is rubbish, etc, etc.

          Do we ever see John going on like that? Do we ever read about this humble saint saying “Oh, my baptisms aren’t that great. And you know, I’m really not that good at preaching repentance. I really suck at public speaking… you can make me feel better any time”. That sort of self-abasement talk is almost like fishing for comments and a pat on the back. John didn’t necessarily think less of himself so much as he thought of himself less, because thinking of yourself in bad terms is still just thinking of yourself as a masked form of pride. John was truly selfless. A good role model of humility for you and I.

          v.15b, that is a pretty incredible statement that he would be filled with the Holy Spirit even from his mother’s womb. Again, that reminds us of God’s grace. Receiving His Spirit is a gift, not something we earn. How could John possibly earn it in his mother’s womb? It was something he could only receive by grace.

          But notice the juxtaposition of wine and strong drink with being filled with the Holy Spirit. This is a contrast that other biblical writers picked up on. Paul, for example, writes in Ephesians 5:15-18See then that you walk circumspectly, not as fools but as wise, redeeming the time, because the days are evil. Therefore do not be unwise, but understand what the will of the Lord is. And do not be drunk with wine, in which is dissipation, but be filled with the Spirit.”

          That word “dissipation” is a golden oldie. We don’t have many words like that anymore. But dissipation simply means decadence, excess, overconsumption, self-indulgence, depravity, squandering and waste. You’ve got a contrast between being filled with strong drink, liquor, alcohol, spirits or being filled with the Holy Spirit, the Comforter, the Guide. And further, there’s a contrast here between the kind of lives that are filled with either “spirits”, drinks, or the Holy Spirit. Being filled with wine leads to a waste and squandered existence. Dissipation. Being filled with the Holy Spirit means being guided into all truth, having the fruit of the Spirit, sanctification being produced in you. The first means a quick run to the toilet to puke. The second means a race run for the glory of God. The first means a life is wasted on self-indulgence. The second means a life is used to further God’s kingdom. The first means confusion. The second means direction and leading. The first means drunkenness and sleep. The second means waking up to the reality that life is a gift of God and that it is too short and too important to be wasted.

          Do not mix with those who drink too much wine or with gluttonous eaters of meat; for the drunkard and the glutton will come to poverty, and drowsiness will clothe a man with rags.Proverbs 23:20. Could a stronger warning be said? Read the rest of Proverbs chapter 23.

          Or what about I Thessalonians 5:4, “But you, brethren, are not in darkness, so that this Day should overtake you as a thief. You are all sons of light and sons of the day. We are not of the night nor of darkness. Therefore let us not sleep, as others do, but let us watch and be sober. For those who sleep, sleep at night, and those who get drunk are drunk at night. But let us who are of the day be sober, putting on the breastplate of faith and love, and as a helmet the hope of salvation.”

          I realize that this is a massive subject with all sorts of questions and things to be said: like is it a sin to drink? All I can say to you now, so that we don’t have an entire night’s study on the subject of consuming alcoholic beverages, is read what the Bible says on the matter. Yes, the saints drank wine. Jesus turned water into wine. Paul recommended Timothy drink wine for his stomach problems. What I think personally right now is that I have known alcoholism to cause too much damage to friends, families and lives for its self-indulgence to ever be worth it. So don’t even go there. Like it says in Proverbs as we read, don’t mix with, don’t hang around with people who are getting drunk. Don’t overlook your own humanity. You may think you can withstand any temptation, but all it takes is one drink too many. And many times, history has shown that temptation is often too great rather than too light.

          John the Baptist had a special calling upon his life and he was to avoid the spirits and be filled with the Spirit. You and I have special callings upon our lives to serve God as He reveals to us. You do the math.

          v.16-17, prophetically speaking, the Jewish people were confident that the prophet Elijah would herald the coming of the Messiah. The angel is touching upon that belief. But while John would not actually be the man Elijah, he would come in the spirit and power of Elijah, in the kind of likeness of the Old Testament prophets.

          But notice the lofty goals set for John’s life: he would turn many of the children of Israel to the Lord and he would turn the hearts of the fathers back to the children and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just. John’s ministry would create change. It would create a spiritual change, in turning Israel to God; a family change, the fathers to the children; and a social change, the disobedient to the wisdom of the just.

          Aren’t these the things that we long for? Don’t we want social change? Don’t we want our generation and the generation to come to rise up and turn from disobedience and all the frivolous rebellion and wild-hearted carelessness of youth to the things that really matter? Don’t we want family change? Don’t we want to see families brought back together and healed? Don’t we want to see fathers stop from abandoning their fatherly duties and raise their families? Don’t we want to see less single mother’s struggling through life? Don’t we want spiritual change, revival in America?

          But notice we’re not going to get it by focusing on each of these things. We can work out all the strategies we want for politics and healing families and raising up the next generation, but one more anti-divorce seminar, one more youth outreach, one more man in office is not going to cut it without the preaching of repentance. That was John’s thing.

          Do you think he would create all this social change because of who he was? Of course not. Remember God’s grace and remember John’s nothingness. It was John’s message that was going to do the job. And it is exactly the same for you and I and our country today.

          What will solve America’s troubles is not a boost to the economy, not better schools, not keeping families together, not even getting a better man elected president. What will solve America’s troubles is getting at the root of America: her people, and the trouble with people is not a lack of education, organization or employment so much as it is a sickness of our souls, a sickness which is targeted only by the message of the gospel. Thus when the gospel is preached and the good news of Jesus Christ dying for the sins of mankind seeps into the hearts of mankind and changes the human soul from within, then we can expect spiritual change, we can expect social change, we can expect changes in families and government and education and politics and economy.

          Let’s not get the cart before the horse. Change comes through the gospel. Change does not come by trying to fix every little part of the problem one at a time. If we want real change, it has to begin in human hearts and it has to begin in our hearts.

          Hear the voice of God: “If My people who are called by My name will humble themselves, and pray and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land” (II Chronicles 7:14).

          Revival will begin here if it begins at all. The land will be healed, if it is healed at all, only if God’s people are humbled and are praying and seeking. There is no other route to any kind of lasting social, cultural, familial, political, spiritual change.

          *That’s quite a lot for one man’s life. John the Baptist has his work cut out for him. But that’s also quite a lot for one old man to take in. Look at Zack’s response:

          v.18, “Look at me, Gabriel. I’m an old man. I’m stricken in years, as it will read in the KJV someday. How could an old man like me and an old woman like my wife not only… how do the young folk say it? Get jiggy-with-it? But how could we possibly bear children?”

          Now note that when this same angel visits Mary later on in the chapter and tells her about a miraculous virgin birth, Mary responds “How can this be, since I do not know a man?” that the angel there doesn’t jump on Mary and claim that she was doubting. What’s clear then is that while Mary will later ask how such a thing could happen, technically speaking, that Zacharias’ concern was not with the procedure of the whole thing but with the fact of its impossibility. With old Zack, it was a problem of doubt.

          v.19, Who is this Gabriel? Remember how the Bible only mentions angels rarely and scarcely as we talked about last week? Well there are only a handful of angels that are actually named in the Bible (that is the 66 books of the Bible not including the apocryphal books some groups ascribe to).

          Can you guess the names of these few angels? Michael, Gabriel, Lucifer. It’s possible that another angel, a fallen one named Abaddon in Hebrew, Apollyon in Greek, is different than Satan. That’s from Revelation 9:11 which talks about the angel of the bottomless pit.

          So there are only a few named angels. Obviously, Gabriel is one of them and he appears not only in Luke’s gospel but also in the book of Daniel. Whereas Michael, identified as an archangel, seems to be a warrior-being that does battle with the devil, Gabriel seems to be more of a messenger delivering God’s words to His people. So apparently there are some different functions that an angel can have.

          Gabriel identifies himself as one “who stands in the presence of God”. You get the sense of a servant standing at his master’s side, awaiting his master’s orders.

          The angel Gabriel answers Zacharias’ doubts much in the same way that God answered the doubts of the saints in the past. When Moses showed some doubts and anxiety about his mission to deliver Israel from bondage in Egypt, God reminded Moses of who He is. In a sense, Gabriel is saying to Zacharias and his doubts “Hey, remember who it is that you’re talking to. I’ve been sent from the presence of God to tell you these things!”

          v.20, realize, ladies and gentlemen, that unbelief has consequences. I’m not talking about “searching” or “seeking”. Please, you can be a seeker.

          Some weeks ago we talked about doubts. Luke wrote this gospel narrative so that Theophilus would know with certainty, in other words, have no doubts concerning these things. And we talked about the fact that we all have our doubts. The Bible anticipates that we as human beings will have our doubts. And we do ourselves and each other a great disservice if we try to hide that fact. If we struggle with doubts, let’s talk through them. Let’s confront them.

          Let me be a little firmer than what I had said previously on the matter of doubts. Previously I had said not to hide doubts but for us to help each other through them. Let me add to that by saying that hiding doubts, living with unbelief can be dangerous and it can have consequences.

          We see that in the case of Zacharias, a righteous man, a good man, but a man who had grown old and doubtful. What was the consequence of Zacharias’ unbelief? That he would not be able to speak until these things would be fulfilled, at least 9 months… that is if he immediately brought in the chocolates, put on Barry White and turned the lights down low as soon as he got back home to his wife.

          By the grace of God, 6 months later Gabriel appeared to Mary and the silence was broken again, but here we have the consequence of unbelief: the silence of the 400 years since the last word from God had been shattered and Gabriel had brought God’s message to one man; the silence was broken, but now it would have to be kept, prolonged for at least another 6 months. For another 6 months, no one would get this message from the Lord, for another 6 months there would be silence, no rejoicing, no instruction, no hope for the future because that would all be laid up in one little old man’s heart as he remained speechless for all that time. Do you see the irony in that? God hadn’t spoken for 400 years and when He did, this man did not believe the words and so he couldn’t speak and the silence, the anticipation, the suffering of a nation in waiting through this long famine of God’s words would be prolonged.

          What is this a picture of (two men carrying a large vine of grapes)? It’s two of the twelve spies coming back from the Promised Land in the book of Numbers, and if you remember the story, here is the point: God had brought Israel out of Egypt, through the Red Sea, to the foot of Mount Sinai, given them the Law, given them the priesthood, fed them with the bread of heaven, and prepared them for war and now they were ready to march into the Promised Land that God had sworn to give to their ancestors Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, now they were ready to go in and conquer the pagan tribes that lived there… only when the twelve spies came back from scoping out the land, only two of the twelve gave a good report of the land and the other ten gave a bad report. How so? Well, the two said that if God was behind them surely they could do it. They had faith.

          But the other ten spies had looked at the giants that lived in the land, the massive warriors and armies and fortifications and they began to doubt. In their spiritual eyes, God became smaller and smaller and their enemies bigger and more dangerous. And the rest of their people suffered and died in that wilderness wandering around for forty years before they had the chance to try to enter the Land of Promise again. For them, the word of God, His promise, was not good enough and their unbelief cost everyone their lives.

          The book of Hebrews takes up this exact point of the danger of unbelief, so let’s look there at Hebrews 3:7-19.

          How dangerous is unbelief? It is dangerous enough to ruin lives. It is dangerous enough to be ascribed to an evil heart. It is dangerous enough to waste all the work that God has done. It is dangerous enough, in the case of Zacharias, to keep the word of God from being heard.

          I was challenged over the past few days in listening to some teachings and debates centered on the cults like the Jehovah’s Witnesses. One of the teachers who had participated in one of the debates was talking about all the things that Jehovah’s Witnesses do in putting in so many hours of service, in going door to door, in evangelizing and handing out all their material, in strategizing how they can reach as many as they can and then what he said cut my heart right open: “It’s amazing that what they do for a lie, we won’t do for the truth.”

          And I still can’t get that thought out of my mind. Why is that? Why is it that groups like any member of any cult can be so devout and work so hard for their religion when here we are and we are still grappling with studying and knowing and understanding this one book. The same teacher in the audio I was listening to also said that your average Jehovah’s Witness studies 5 hours a week just to talk to you, and we prepare ourselves with an hour and half Bible study on Monday nights, an hour on Sundays, and whatever meager scraps of minutes we can scrape together during the week?

          “The Bible study is so long. I can’t sit for that long. My butt hurts.” Tough! Tough on your butt. Sorry, but it is. Think about the insanity of it: how can we expect to be effective in the world with so little training, dedication, study and so light faith?

          Here we’re talking about a group, Jehovah’s Witnesses, that memorizes the Bible for a lie when we could hardly even think of memorizing a verse or two. I had heard that the average Jehovah’s Witness is more than a match for the average seminary graduate. That’s the amount of dedication and training they put into it, for a lie and for a deception.

          We have the truth, but why don’t we act upon it. Why do we flee from evangelical conversation? Why do we hesitate to communicate the truth we just learned to our friends when we see the opportunities? Why do we let slide the most important study of all studies? I think it comes all the way back to this one fundamental problem: unbelief. We don’t believe it enough, if we did then don’t you think we’d act upon it?

          We believe God exists and loves us and has a plan for us and all that handy-dandy cotton candy, but what about when the Bible describes us being watchmen, describes us as the light of the world, as going out into all the world to make disciples. We shrug that off for the missionaries, for the pastor/teachers. But it is said to every Christian disciple.

          My friends, it is true that these cults that surround us have built up such a system that demands that they work to earn their salvations, and that may be to blame for their zealous overachievement, but we certainly have a motivation that, if felt, is truly greater. We realize that we don’t earn our way into heaven by completing so many tasks, by making pilgrimages, by going through certain ceremonies, by being baptized, by keeping laws, by proselytizing and evangelizing, by going door to door, but Paul said “the love of Christ compels us, because we are convinced that One died for all…”

          And that’s it. Christianity doesn’t hold out the prize of salvation to those who can complete some religious checklist. True biblical Christianity is centered around the person of Jesus Christ and it is the love that He demonstrated on the cross for your sins and mine which motivates us to talk about it, learn about it, share it and make it central to our lives. There is an entire world all around us literally starving to death because of the famine of the word of God, and we cannot let our unbelief in the truth keep the silence.

          What am I asking you to do tonight, then? Three things in closing:

          One, recognize that unbelief is dangerous. We can have our doubts, but let’s not lie with them. Let’s not wait passively by for someone to come along and cure them or not. Let’s actively study and research to see whether those doubts are founded or unfounded, whether they are real or unreal. Unbelief is too dangerous to just let it slide. Deal with it actively. Don’t play around with it.

          Two, read your Bibles. Such a simple phrase, and yet it carries such complexity and difficulty and promise. Study your Bibles. Research your Bibles. Even *gasp* memorize your Bibles. We can’t expect to shut down heresy if the heretics know more about our book than we do, if we’re walking around with the theological foundation of a six-year-old. Get in the game. Learn the original language. What? Yes! Read some commentaries. Listen to more teachings. Get it into your head and into your heart.

          Third, my point of it all: Unbelief will keep the words of God from being heard.  Unbelief will keep the silence. As in the case of Zacharias, as in the case of you and I. If we’re not studying the Bible, it may be because of laziness or busy-ness, but unbelief is somewhere in their too. And unbelief will not only keep us from hearing the word of God in turning to it to study it, but unbelief will also keep us from causing others to hear the word of God since we won’t talk about it.

          The cure is in reading the word of God. It’s one of those things that the more you do it the more you get out of it. The more you do it, perhaps, the easier it gets. How do you get more faith? Ironically, you get it by going to the thing that unbelief will keep your from: the word of God. Romans 10:17, “Faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.” Unbelief will keep you from God’s words when that is exactly what you need to cast out unbelief!

          If we want to see change, change in our country, our culture, our friends and in our families it’s not going to come from more programs, more strategies, more business and more organizations. Rather, it is going to come here: through the hearing of the word of God, the gospel, the preaching and teaching and studying of the Bible.



No comments:

Post a Comment