Saturday, June 21, 2014

College Study #77: "Christology from Above"




‘Behold, the Lamb of God’

ide o amnos tou theou

College Study

77th teaching

6.16.2014

 

“Christology from Above”
 
 
 

          Review:

                    So we just finished the first section of our study in Christology, which we called “the Identity of Christ”. Our introduction gave us a starting point for answering the central question of Christology: “Who is Jesus Christ?” In beginning to answer that question, our introduction based itself largely on the structure of the Tetralemma, the four-part problem which poses that Jesus was either a Liar, a Lunatic, a Legend or the Lord. We considered such topics as the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth, any correlations between Jesus and other ancient religions, and exactly how the Bible describes Jesus as the Son of God.

                   Last time we met, we addressed a topic that served as a bridge between the introduction, “the Identity of Christ”, and our second section in Christology: which we’ll call “the Nature of Christ”. What was our topic from last time? This topic reminded us that Christology is a unique science, in that its subject (Jesus) is both the center of the study and the moral example by which we ought to live our lives, the goal we ought to strive toward. And so we discussed three keywords that have to do with salvation, three keywords that describe different aspects of salvation. What were they? Which of these three words describes what we talked about in becoming more like Christ? The title of the last study, “Restoring the Image”, illustrated that becoming more like Christ is sort of like restoring a ruined piece of art, since we were once created in the image of God, which sin then corrupted, though now we are being transformed into His image through the process we call sanctification.        

          End of Review

 

          We’re going to dive right in to this second section of Christology. The first part was “the Identity of Christ”. The second part is called “the Nature of Christ”.

          What do we mean when we say the nature of Christ? The word nature we most often use to refer to outdoor-stuff: trees, rocks, mountains, rivers, animals, storms, etc. But when we use the word nature here, we’re talking about the basic features and the characteristics of Jesus Christ. The Nature of Christ is a section mostly concerned with the Deity and the Humanity of Christ, what’s known as His dual natures. There’s a whole sub-section then of Christology devoted to Christ’s Nature, because He has two of them, a God-nature or divine characteristics and qualities and a human-nature or human characteristics and qualities. To borrow other phrases from our studies in the past, Jesus Christ has physical qualities (such as real, physical human beings have) and also meta­physical qualities (that is, qualities and characteristics beyond the physical and into the supernatural).

          So in this second section, “the Nature of Christ”, we’re going to learn about the two natures of Christ: His Deity and His humanity. Tonight’s  study is entitled: “Christology from Above”. Perhaps that gives you an idea of which of the two natures we’re going to discuss first.

          I’ll explain what our title for tonight means in a moment, but first turn to Titus 2. There are passages everywhere in the Bible that point to the nature of Jesus Christ, and one of the clearest of them is found here in Titus 2. It’s a short chapter, so let’s read through the whole thing.

          Paul begins this chapter by giving some structure for the Christian life, first to the older men and women, and then to the young men and then to servants.

          2:1-15, “But as for you, speak the things which are proper for sound doctrines: that the older men be sober, reverent, temperate, sound in faith, in love, in patience; the older women likewise, that they be reverent in behavior, not slanderers, not given to much wine, teachers of good things—that they admonish the young women to love their husbands, to love their children, to be discreet, chaste, homemakers, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God may not be blasphemed. Likewise, exhort the young men to be sober-minded, in all things showing yourself to be a pattern of good works; in doctrine showing integrity, reverence, incorruptibility, sound speech that cannot be condemned, that one who is an opponent may be ashamed, having nothing evil to say of you. Exhort bondservants [those of you with jobs] to be obedient to their masters, to be well pleasing in all things, not answering back, not thieving, but showing all good honesty, that they may adorn the doctrine of God our Savior in all things.

            For the grace of God that brings salvation has appeared to all men, teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly in the present age, looking for the blessed hope and glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ, who gave Himself for us, that He might redeem us from every lawless deed and purify for Himself His own special people, zealous for good works. Speak these things, encourage and rebuke with all authority. Let no one despise you.”

          The key verse for our study tonight is v.13, where Jesus Christ is identified as the great God and Savior. Many have attempted to deny that Jesus is God by saying that the Bible never makes such a claim. Clearly it does. And there are many other references to Jesus being God, as we shall see tonight.

          Pastor Alistair Begg: “What do we do with this man: Jesus? If He is not the Son of God and Savior of mankind, then let us get down to the bitter business of adjusting to a grim and hopeless world. If He is, then let us give Him the full measure of our loyalty and our love.”

          This is a huge issue. Talking about the Deity of Christ and believing this basic doctrine of Christianity is massive. If this Man, Jesus of Nazareth, who lived in 1st century Palestine, who had a brief traveling ministry and who was crucified at age 33, is not the Son of God, co-equal with God, the Lord Himself in the flesh, then at best He is truly dead, and has been dead for many centuries, joining the company of other merely moral teachers who said good things to live by, but who have no power to help us or save us.

          If Jesus was just such an ordinary Man, admittedly a good man but merely a man, then as we heard quoted: There’s nothing for it but to get on with adjusting to a grim and hopeless world, one in which there is no comfort or salvation or light at the end of the tunnel, where human existence is a brief and meaningless accident in the span of a hostile and uncaring universe, where you’ll die in ultimate obscurity and be forgotten in the passing of a few years.

          But if Jesus was more than just a man, if He was and is the God-made-man, then that changes everything. All of history, all the universe, all of human life suddenly gains hope, meaning, destiny, pointedness and purpose, and the great God and Savior Jesus Christ deserves the full measure of our attentions, our loyalty and our love.

          So don’t miss how absolutely huge this is. If Jesus was not God, then all of Christianity is a sham and it, and with it all of our existence, falls apart and becomes worthless. But if Jesus is God, then we can sit down as we are and discuss how this God became flesh and dwelt among us and died for us and redeemed us and gives us purpose to live for His glory.

          Here are our points for tonight:

1.    What is Christology from Above?

2.    Discovering the Deity of Christ

3.    The Claims of Christ

4.    The Attributes of God

5.    The Deity of Self

         

1.   What is Christology from Above?

          In the past, great theologians and students of the Word have wrestled with Christology: how to create a structure for studying it, what subjects to include in it, what is orthodox and what is heresy, or where to begin in studying Christology? How does one approach such a subject, vast and transcendent in its content?

          So then two different approaches developed, two ways to approach the study of Christ and these are known as “Christology from Above” and “Christology from Below”, high Christology and low Christology. They helped provide some guidance on where to begin a study of Christ, how to approach this great subject.

          For example, Christology from Below, low Christology, is an approach that begins by considering Jesus’ human aspects and nature first, His life on earth, His miracles and parables and teachings and death and all that He did, before moving on to His deity and the incarnation that brought human and divine together. So Christology from Below starts with Jesus’ humanity and arrives at Jesus’ divinity, it starts with His life and actions and ends with His supernatural nature. It takes the study to the human life of Jesus and then interprets and understands His divinity based on that.

          Christology from Above, or high Christology, is exactly the opposite. This approach to the study begins with the Deity of Christ and His pre-existence as the Logos (the Word) before His incarnation and human life on earth. Jesus’ life and action, then, are interpreted and understood based on His divine nature primarily. Christology from Above, it seems to me, considers His Divine identity and then interprets His actions, whereas Christology from Below considers His humanity and actions and then interprets them as pointing to His divinity.

          Both approaches are fine, I think. I would only maybe give Christology from Above the upper hand and say it is the better of the two because it begins with Christ’s first nature and works forward, rather than His second nature and working backward to the first as in the case with Christology from Below.

          What’s more, apparently Christology from Above was the prevailing understanding of Jesus Christ in the early church and throughout a large portion of church history, with men such as the first century Christian Ignatius of Antioch and on into the middle ages to Thomas Aquinas who first systematized Christology with an emphasis on His deity first then humanity second.

          As our title indicates, we’re taking the high road rather than the low road, Christology from Above this week and then Christology from Below next time. Both Jesus’ Deity and His Humanity will be considered, but you’ve got to start somewhere so we’re starting with the classic approach, the original approach that the early church knew and understood: Christology from Above.

          It is important that we consider both approaches. We’ve often seen how there’s balance to the doctrines of the Bible and a harmonious balance in God Himself. None of God’s attributes fight for space or are more important and more prominent than His other attributes, rather they each form a perfect network and harmony within Him. So too, we’ve discussed how the biblical portrayal of Jesus Christ is a balanced one: He is both Lover and Lord, Redeemer and Judge, Lion and Lamb.

          With these Christological approaches, there’s a danger if we do not use a balance of them, since both approaches, the high and the low, have weaknesses to them.

          For example, if we focus too much on Christology from Above to the exclusion of His humanity  than we can undermine the fact that He was a real Man and end up in the early heresies that believed Jesus was just a spirit or a ghost. Contrariwise, focusing too much on Christology from Below to the exclusion of His deity might mean that we join the world in saying that He was merely a good moral teacher and that some extrapolation and corruption made its way into the Bible, adding words to Jesus that seem to make it appear as if He is God, when we can’t really know that, we can’t really believe He is the same as God, He was just a Man.

          There needs to be a balance of both approaches. You need both John’s gospel and Luke’s gospel. John emphasizes Christ’s deity and Luke emphasizes Christ’s humanity. Both views are there. The Bible contains a balanced portrayal of Jesus.

2.   Discovering the Deity of Christ

          So earlier I said to myself, “Self, you could just give them a bunch of verses and chapters proving the Deity of Christ through the Bible… or you could let them search and discover for themselves!” As Bill Nye the Science Guy recently pointed out in the debate with Ken Ham, there is a joy in discovering new things. Of course he was talking about science, but I suggest to you that discovery is just as joyful and just as possible in the field of science we call Christology.

          What we’re going to do then is a group exercise: Let’s split into two groups. Each group will take the same chapter in the Bible and see how many times this chapter points out that Jesus is God. You’ll need to use your time wisely and discuss possible references as a group. Use your reasoning and look carefully for direct and indirect references to Christ’s deity. Look out for different ways that the verses express the same idea of Jesus’ deity. You’ll have a bit of time to complete the exercise. At the end of the exercise, the groups will take turns revealing their discoveries and the group that discovered the most references to deity wins.

          Turn to John chapter one. The prologue to John’s gospel is the classic passage on the incarnation, the pre-existence and the deity of Christ. This is a prime field to search through for references.

          Now this is your chance to read for yourself, employ your mind to understand and interpret for yourself, and see what you can see rather than merely allow a teacher to tell you what’s there and what isn’t. Begin by reading through the chapter together as a group and then start to write down your list of references to deity. (START)

          In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made. In Him was life, and the life was the light of men. And the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it.

          There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. This man came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all through him might believe. He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light. That was the true Light which gives light to every man coming into the world. He was in the world, and the world was made through Him, and the world did not know Him. He came to His own, and His own did not receive Him. But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name: who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.

          And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth. John bore witness of Him and cried out, saying, ‘This was He of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me is preferred before me, for He was before me’. And of His fullness we have all received, and grace for grace. For the law was given through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. No one has seen God at any time. The only begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, He has declared Him.

            Now this is the testimony of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, ‘Who are you?’ He confessed, and did not deny, but confessed, ‘I am not the Christ.’ And they asked him, ‘What then? Are you Elijah?’ He said, ‘I am not.’ ‘Are you the Prophet?’ And he answered, ‘No’. Then they said to him, ‘Who are you, that we may give an answer to those who sent us? What do you say about yourself?’ He said: ‘I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness: make straight the way of the LORD,’ as the prophet Isaiah said.’ Now these who were sent were from the Pharisees. And they asked him, saying, ‘Why then do you baptize if you are not the Christ, nor Elijah, nor the Prophet?’ John answered them, saying, “I baptize with water, but there stands One among you whom you do not know. It is He who, coming after me, is preferred before me, whose sandal strap I am not worthy to loose.’ These things were done in Bethabara beyond the Jordan, where John was baptizing.

            The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, ‘Behold! The Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world! This is He of whom I said, ‘After me comes a Man who is preferred before me, for He was before me.’ I did not know Him; but that He should be revealed to Israel, therefore I came baptizing with water.’ And John bore witness, saying, ‘I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and He remained upon Him. I did not know Him, but He who sent me to baptize with water said to me, ‘Upon whom you see the Spirit descending, and remaining on Him, this is He who baptizes with the Holy Spirit.’ And I have seen and testified that this is the Son of God.

            Again, the next day, John stood with two of his disciples. And looking at Jesus as He walked, he said, ‘Behold the Lamb of God!’ The two disciples heard him speak, and they followed Jesus. Then Jesus turned, and seeing them following, said to them, ‘What do you seek?’ They said to Him, ‘Rabbi’ (which is to say, when translated, Teacher), ‘where are You staying?’ He said to them, ‘Come and see.’ They came and saw where He was staying, and remained with Him that day (now it was about the tenth hour). One of the two who heard John speak, and followed Him, was Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother. He first found his own brother Simon, and said to him, ‘We have found the Messiah’ (which is translated, the Christ). And he brought him to Jesus. Now when Jesus looked at him, He said, ‘You are Simon the son of Jonah. You shall be called Cephas” (which is translated, A Stone).

            The following day Jesus wanted to go to Galilee, and He found Philip and said to him ‘Follow Me’. Now Philip was from Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter. Philip found Nathanael and said to him, ‘We have found Him of whom Moses in the law, and also the prophets, wrote—Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.’ And Nathanael said to him, ‘Can anything good come out of Nazareth?’ Philip said to him, ‘Come and see’. Jesus saw Nathanael coming toward Him, and said of him, ‘Behold, an Israelite indeed, in whom is no deceit!’ Nathanael said to Him, ‘How do You know me?’ Jesus answered and said to him, ‘Before Philip called you, when you were under the fig tree, I saw you.’ Nathanael answered and said to Him, ‘Rabbi, You are the Son of God! You are the King of Israel!’ Jesus answered and said to him, ‘Because I said to you, ‘I saw you under the fig tree’, do you believe? You will see greater things than these.’ And He said to him, ‘Most assuredly, I say to you, hereafter you shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of Man.”

         
 

          So what I think this illustrates is that there’s more to each passage than meets the eye, and a careful reading of familiar verses can still yield new discoveries.      

          We’re going to stop here and continue on our study next week with: the claims of Christ, the attributes of God and the final point, the deity of Self. However, something I can’t pass up is this perfect opportunity to bring back “Project Scriptura”. As mentioned, one of the points we’ll take up next week is on the attributes of God, specifically how the attributes we’ve studied recently are seen not only in God but also in His Son Jesus Christ. Clearly, that’s an indication that Jesus and God are the same if they share the same attributes, both the communicable and the non-communicable attributes, those God doesn’t share with His creatures.

          So the task for Project Scriptura for next week is to find one verse which shows Jesus demonstrating one of the attributes of God. Have fun!

 

No comments:

Post a Comment